( For more information on the detailed definitions of Indie and
Trad, as well as the findings from that earlier analysis, see the previous
blog Amazon Top 100 Kindle
Books - Indies versus Trads.)
As we can see in the first table, Traditionally published
books had more reviews per title on average than Independently published books,
but the Indies actually had higher average ratings in Amazon’s 5 point scale
(with 5 being the maximum rating). Note
that the number of books in the Top 100 for each group is also shown. The second table shows that this was finding
held generally, even after breaking the data down by individual publisher.
Publisher Category
|
NumBooks
|
Avg
Num Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Traditional
|
76
|
1634
|
4.09
|
Indie
|
24
|
1208
|
4.23
|
Grand Total
|
100
|
1532
|
4.12
|
Publisher
|
NumBooks
|
Avg
Num Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Indie
|
24
|
1,208
|
4.23
|
Penguin
|
20
|
1,661
|
3.92
|
Hachette
|
19
|
1,497
|
4.13
|
Random House
|
15
|
1,796
|
4.13
|
Simon & Schuster
|
13
|
1,528
|
4.20
|
Harper Collins
|
4
|
1,669
|
4.10
|
Harlequin
|
2
|
774
|
4.15
|
Doubleday
|
1
|
2,852
|
4.20
|
MacMillan
|
1
|
2,896
|
4.20
|
William Morrow
|
1
|
1,728
|
4.30
|
Grand Total
|
100
|
1532
|
4.12
|
Traditional
|
|||
Gender
|
Num Books
|
Avg
Num Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Female
|
51
|
1,362
|
4.08
|
Male
|
25
|
2,188
|
4.10
|
Indie
|
|||
Gender
|
Num Books
|
Avg
Num Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Female
|
19
|
1,006
|
4.22
|
Male
|
5
|
1,975
|
4.28
|
Looking at price points, I have categorized prices into
three ranges: low (under $4.00), moderate ($4.00 to $7.99) and high (over
$8.00). Again, note that Indie books had
higher average ratings than traditional books, at both the low price range and
the moderate price range (there were no high priced Indies). Also note that there was no strong association
between the price of a book and the average rating (in fact high price
traditional books had the lowest average rating of all categories). Here’s the detailed breakdown of Indie versus
Trad by price category:
Traditional
|
|||
Price Range
|
Num Books
|
Avg
Num Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
1-Low
|
13
|
1,207
|
4.03
|
2-Mod
|
45
|
1,820
|
4.14
|
3-High
|
18
|
1,476
|
4.00
|
Indie
|
|||
Price Range
|
Num Books
|
Avg
Num Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
1-Low
|
17
|
1,251
|
4.21
|
2-Mod
|
7
|
1,103
|
4.27
|
3-High
|
0
|
0
|
0.00
|
Traditional
|
|||
Avg Reviews
|
Num
Books
|
Num
Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Fiction
|
73
|
1,624
|
4.09
|
Non-fiction
|
3
|
1,867
|
4.13
|
Indie
|
|||
Avg Reviews
|
Num
Books
|
Num
Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Fiction
|
23
|
1,202
|
4.23
|
Non-fiction
|
1
|
1,344
|
4.30
|
Genre, of course is always of great importance when looking at Indie vs Trad publishing. As we know from the previous blog, Indies are heavily weighted towards Romance,
along with a smaller tendency towards SciFi/Fantasy. In fact, Indies are very competitive in these
genres, in terms of number of titles in the Top 100. They also appear to be more than competitive
in terms of reader satisfaction; in all of the genres where Indies have cracked
the Top 100 they have in fact received higher average ratings than Trads. The average number of reviews per book is
also quite close, in these genres.
Traditional
|
|||
Avg Reviews
|
Num Books
|
Num
Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Romance
|
29
|
1197
|
4.16
|
Thriller
|
28
|
1891
|
4.06
|
LitFic
|
11
|
1733
|
4.05
|
SciFi/Fantasy
|
4
|
2567
|
3.83
|
Other
|
4
|
1795
|
4.10
|
Indie
|
|||
Avg Reviews
|
Num Books
|
Num
Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
Romance
|
18
|
1031
|
4.23
|
Thriller
|
0
|
0
|
0.00
|
LitFic
|
0
|
0
|
0.00
|
SciFi/Fantasy
|
3
|
2046
|
4.30
|
Other
|
3
|
1434
|
4.17
|
One area where Trads still hold a distinct edge over Indies is
in the top tier of the Top 100 ranking, namely the first quartile (that’s the
top 25 books). As the tables show, they
not only dominated the top quartile in terms of the number of titles, but also
in terms of the average number of reader reviews, and they had a slight edge in
terms of reader satisfaction. However,
in the other quartiles of the distribution, Indies tended to do as well or
better in both average number of reader reviews and average ranking.
Traditional
|
|||
Quartile
|
Num
Books
|
Num
Reviews
|
Avg
Rating
|
1
|
21
|
3,051
|
4.14
|
2
|
21
|
1,379
|
4.07
|
3
|
18
|
998
|
4.06
|
4
|
16
|
824
|
4.08
|
Indie
|
|||
Quartile
|
Num
Books
|
Number
|
Rating
|
1
|
4
|
1,483
|
4.08
|
2
|
4
|
1,367
|
4.25
|
3
|
7
|
1,168
|
4.20
|
4
|
9
|
1,047
|
4.31
|
-
Not only have Indies broken into the big time
(i.e. the Top 100 Kindle list), they also seem to have been discovered by a
satisfied readership, as measured by reader review rankings. In fact, reader reviewers seem to be more
satisfied with Indies than Trads overall.
-
However, at the top end of the list (the first
25) Trads still hold an edge in number of titles and a slight edge in reader
satisfaction.
-
When breaking out the data by the gender of the
author, Indies scored higher in reader rankings regardless of whether they were
women or men.
-
Indies still sell at lower price points, but
when compared to Trads within those same price ranges, readers appear to be
more satisfied with Indie books. One must always bear in mind, however, that Indies can afford to sell at lower price points due to the generally higher royalty rates than can pocket. An Indie at a the lowest price point may well be earning as much in royalties as a Trad at a much higher price point.
-
The most popular Kindle books are still almost
exclusively fiction, Indie or Trad.
Though the numbers of non-fiction titles were small for both groups,
Indies had the higher average reader ratings.
-
The highest selling Indies are still
predominately in the Romance category, with considerable success in Sci-Fi and
Fantasy as well. In both those
categories, Indies score higher in average reader rating than their Trad
counterparts.
It is natural to wonder what might account for these
findings. It is just speculation, but a
few hypotheses come to mind:
-
The kind of reader who chooses Indies over Trads
might be inclined to give Indies the benefit of the doubt, as they still have
an outsider or underdog status.
-
Conversely, the type of reader who predominantly
chooses Trads over Indies might be quite demanding of those writers, since they
have been vetted by gatekeepers and curators.
The relatively low reader ratings given to the highest priced books (all
Trad) would tend to support this supposition.
-
It may be that the editorial assistance offered
by traditional publishers and agents actually interferes with the quality of
the product (too many cooks) and readers might be picking up on that.
-
The agent and publisher gatekeeping system might
actually be biasing book selection in ways that the general public doesn’t
really care for. Indies may simply be in
a better position to give readers what they want, having less of an intellectual
investment in the assumptions of the traditional system.
-
Conversely, it could be argued that Indies are
giving their readers literary junk food, and people like their junk food even
though it isn’t the best choice for them.
Anyway, I am sure that’s what many in the established system would like
to think.
There are still a number of interesting things to explore in
this data. For example:
-
How well does the number of reviews seem to
correspond to number of sales? (via
examining the list ranked by sales vs number of reviews).
-
How is the money being divvied up? (via multiplying prices by sales, as best as
we can estimate them from sales rank and numbers of reviews).
In addition, it would be interesting to compare the Top 100
Amazon Kindle ebooks versus the Top 100 Amazon print books. As time permits, we will look at these
topics.
No comments:
Post a Comment