Part Four – Dystopia vs. Utopia in
Science Fiction
Question: Helena Puumala, I
note that the Kati of Terra books are generally pretty up-tempo and
optimistic, though they don’t shy away from some serious
environmental and social problems. For example, Kati 1 is set in a
post global warming catastrophe world while Kati 2 is set on a planet
where the local version of the 1% (i.e. the oligarchs) have exploited
the bulk of the population for far too long. How do you reconcile
this contrast?
Answer: I think that I have
read far too many SF books that describe an unpleasant, uncomfortable
dystopia, setting these narratives in a relentlessly pessimistic
background, never pulling these worlds out of their doldrums. In
response to that, I wanted to write books that would offer my readers
some hope of a brighter future.
Question: In a sense, though,
you do include a dystopian streak. You have dealt with environmental
themes, social injustice, slavery, even child abduction. Yet the
books are definitely not depressing. The characters take these
things in stride, and generally overcome these obstacles, even to the
point of helping to set things right.
Answer: That’s how I wanted
to do things. Kati is never overcome by obstacles, which is to say
she never lets them overwhelm her. She is fully aware of the
seriousness of the situations in which she finds herself, often very
dangerous situations, but she refuses to give in to a negative or
despairing world view. She insists on working things out, as best
she can. It’s the same with Mikal. I suppose that they are
optimists as well as romantics.
Question: Well, real people
sometimes do go through incredibly difficult circumstances, yet still
survive and even prevail. Sometimes they even have fun doing so, at
least part of the time. For example, a lot of people who lived
through WW2 seem to have a lot of surprisingly positive
reminiscences.
Answer: That’s how I wanted
to write Kati – the sort of person who can be a positive beacon for
other people, even in the most trying of circumstances. Mikal’s
mixed background helps Kati out, as well. Lamania, his mother’s
home planet is an exemplar of civilization, looked upon by most of
the rest of the Star Federation as a place to be emulated, as a fair,
though not by any means perfect, society. Borq, his father’s home
world, has also overcome its less civilized tendencies, largely due
to its turn towards a matriarchal social structure. So Mikal knows
that things can get better. I hasten to add that the planets in my
world have used many strategies to overcome their social problems ) –
many still have a long way to go, though.
Question: Well, it’s a big
galaxy, so it’s interesting to let all sorts of arrangements get a
try-out. And it’s refreshing to think that alternative realities,
including our own future, can be hopeful.
Answer: Hope is great, but I
also hope that human beings will always have serious challenges to
overcome.
Question: That’s a paradox.
Answer: But of course, the best
things in life are.
No comments:
Post a Comment