Saturday, 7 May 2022

Abortion Laws and Fertility Rates

 

Abortion Laws and Fertility Rates

I generally try to stay away from highly political subjects, but as a data scientist (who sometimes has to do a bit of demographic analysis) I can’t help observing patterns in data that might help to explain events in the world, to myself if to nobody else.

Here’s a pattern that I think helps explain why the Roe vs Wade (abortion rights) issue has re-emerged in the United States this. I say re-emerge, though obviously this issue has never been far from the forefront of the political battlefield. However, the Supreme Court has taken up the issue again, after being mostly unwilling to touch it, after 50 years. Why is that?

Well obviously, there have been changes in the makeup of the Supreme Court recently which have shifted the balance of the membership to a more restrictive stance (or so it is assumed). But, the membership of the court has always been in flux and has had right-leaning majorities at other times in the past five decades. So, what else has changed?

Here is where the graph shown above comes into the picture. It takes a global view of the relationship between abortion laws and fertility rates, at a country-by-country level. 

Abortion laws have been rated by the degree to which they restrict rights to abortion. Completed fertility rates indicate the average number of children a woman is expected to have over her lifetime, given current trends in any given country. (Detailed data and sources for the data are given at the end of the blog.)

The graph shows that there is a clear association between abortion rights and completed fertility rates. Countries with more restrictive laws tend to have higher fertility rates, while those with less restrictive laws have lower fertility rates.

That’s not to say that this is a cause and effect relationship – it is more likely correlational. It isn’t necessarily that more liberal abortion laws lead to more abortions, which lead to a lower birth rate. That is probably far too simplistic. (In fact there has been some research showing that the reverse is often true, as women who have an abortion often stop at one child).

It is more a matter of what economists refer to as “nudges” or what political scientists would likely call signalling from the wider public culture. The relative strictness of abortion laws within a society sends a signal about the value that is placed on family formation and reproduction by that society. That signal is, of course, tangled up within a mesh of other cultural aspects, such as religion, economics and cultural traditions and standards. The same is true of matters such as public support for daycare and other efforts to make life-work balance more amenable to child-rearing in general.


Why would this be happening now? The second graph helps to explain that. As you can see nearly two-thirds of the world’s population are now living in relatively low fertility countries, with nearly four-tenths living in below replacement fertility countries (replacement fertility is conventionally estimated to be about 2.1). So, at the global level, the ratio of population sources to population sinks is shifting. That means that using immigration to drive population policies will become less and less tenable.

Along with that, other phenomena are showing the limits of globalization theory. For example:

  • Pandemics are more likely when travel and trade is relatively unrestricted.

  • The fragility of complex world-wide supply-chains is being revealed, partly from the Covid pandemic and partly from geopolitical conflict, such as the situation in Ukraine.

  • The impact of population policies on global warming will become more and more urgent.

  • Countries may be less and less willing to allow emigration, especially of their brightest and best educated. There may come an expectation that they should stay home and help their native land to develop. “Poaching” these highly skilled people may even become seen to be immoral, a new form of human resource colonialism.

I am inclined to believe that demographic issues will become more and more contested in the near future, especially in the lower fertility countries. The re-opening of Roe vs Wade is likely just an early phase in this development. Sometimes efforts to address these matters will be cast in what are conventionally considered conservative terms (e.g. stricter abortion laws), sometimes in what are conventionally considered liberal terms (e.g. more public funding for early childcare). Often the demographic realities underlying the policies will be downplayed or ignored, as there is a sort of taboo about these issues, though I think those taboos will dissipate in the near future. Demographic realities pretty well demand that.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



There are two sources for the graph data, which are given below.

The x-axis is a categorization of countries by how restrictive their abortion laws currently are. The data is from the group “Center for Reproductive Rights”. The categorizations are given below.

Category I. Prohibited Altogether (24 countries)

Category II. To Save the Woman’s Life (43 countries)

Category III. To Preserve Health (53 countries)

Category IV. Socioeconomic Grounds (13 countries)

Category V. On Request (Gestational Limits Vary) (75 countries)

website: https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/

The y-axis is from the website of the organization World Population Review, which has statistics on both population and completed fertility rates.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/total-fertility-rate

For completeness here are graphs using unweighted means and medians for the fertility measures.



And here is a detailed list of countries used for the graphs, with Abortion Law categorizations, fertility rates and populations by country.

LawCateg

CountryLaw

Median - fertilityRate

Average - fertilityRate

Sum - Population

1

Andorra

1.30

1.30

77,463


Aruba



107,609


Congo (Brazzaville)

4.40

4.40

5,797,805


Curaçao



165,529


Dominican Republic

2.30

2.30

11,056,370


Egypt

3.30

3.30

106,156,692


El Salvador

2.00

2.00

6,550,389


Haiti

2.90

2.90

11,680,283


Honduras

2.50

2.50

10,221,247


Iraq

3.70

3.70

42,164,965


Jamaica

2.00

2.00

2,985,094


Laos

2.70

2.70

7,481,023


Madagascar

4.10

4.10

29,178,077


Malta

1.20

1.20

444,033


Mauritania

4.60

4.60

4,901,981


Nicaragua

1.70

1.70

6,779,100


Palau: ?

2.20

2.20

18,233


Philippines

2.60

2.60

112,508,994


San Marino



34,085


Senegal

4.60

4.60

17,653,671


Sierra Leone

4.30

4.30

8,306,436


Suriname

2.40

2.40

596,831


Tonga

3.60

3.60

107,749


West Bank & Gaza Strip



626,161

2

Afghanistan

4.50

4.50

40,754,388


Antigua & Barbuda

2.00

2.00

99,509


Bahrain

2.00

2.00

1,783,983


Bangladesh

2.00

2.00

167,885,689


Bhutan: R, I, +

2.00

2.00

787,941


Brazil: R, +

1.70

1.70

215,353,593


Brunei Darussalam

1.80

1.80

445,431


Chile: R, F

1.60

1.60

19,250,195


Côte d’Ivoire: R

4.60

4.60

27,742,298


Dominica

1.90

1.90

72,344


Gabon: R, I, F, +

4.00

4.00

2,331,533


Gambia: F

5.20

5.20

2,558,482


Guatemala

2.90

2.90

18,584,039


Indonesia: R, F, SA

2.30

2.30

279,134,505


Iran: F

2.10

2.10

86,022,837


Kiribati

3.60

3.60

123,419


Lebanon

2.10

2.10

6,684,849


Libya

2.20

2.20

7,040,745


Malawi

4.20

4.20

20,180,839


Mali: R, I

5.90

5.90

21,473,764


Marshall Islands: ?

4.00

4.00

60,057


Mexico: R, F,

2.10

2.10

131,562,772


Micronesia: ?,

3.10

3.10

117,489


Myanmar

2.20

2.20

55,227,143


Nigeria

5.40

5.40

216,746,934


Oman

2.90

2.90

5,323,993


PA



0


Panama: R, F, PA

2.50

2.50

4,446,964


Papua New Guinea

3.60

3.60

9,292,169


Paraguay

2.40

2.40

7,305,843


Solomon Islands

4.40

4.40

721,159


Somalia



16,841,795


South Sudan

4.70

4.70

11,618,511


Sri Lanka

2.20

2.20

21,575,842


Sudan: R

4.40

4.40

45,992,020


Syria: SA, PA

2.80

2.80

19,364,809


Tanzania

4.90

4.90

63,298,550


Timor-Leste: PA

4.00

4.00

1,369,429


Tuvalu



12,066


Uganda

5.00

5.00

48,432,863


United Arab Emirates (UAE): F, SA,

1.40

1.40

10,081,785


Venezuela

2.30

2.30

29,266,991


Yemen: SA

3.80

3.80

31,154,867

3

Algeria

3.00

3.00

45,350,148


Angola: R, I, F, PA

5.50

5.50

35,027,343


Bahamas

1.80

1.80

400,516


Benin: R, I, F

4.80

4.80

12,784,726


Bolivia: R, I

2.70

2.70

11,992,656


Botswana: R, I, F

2.90

2.90

2,441,162


Burkina Faso: R, I, F

5.20

5.20

22,102,838


Burundi

5.40

5.40

12,624,840


Cameroon: R

4.60

4.60

27,911,548


Central African Rep.: R, I, F, +

4.70

4.70

5,016,678


Chad: R, I, F

5.70

5.70

17,413,580


Colombia: R, I, F

1.80

1.80

51,512,762


Comoros

4.20

4.20

907,419


Costa Rica

1.80

1.80

5,182,354


Dem. Rep. of Congo: R, I, F

5.90

5.90

95,240,792


Djibouti

2.70

2.70

1,016,097


Ecuador: +

2.40

2.40

18,113,361


Equatorial Guinea: SA, PA

4.50

4.50

1,496,662


Eritrea: R, I, +

4.10

4.10

3,662,244


Eswatini (formerly Swaziland):

3.00

3.00

1,184,817


Ghana: R, I, F, +

3.90

3.90

32,395,450


Grenada

2.10

2.10

113,475


Guinea: R, I, F

4.70

4.70

13,865,691


Israel: R, I, F, +

3.10

3.10

8,922,892


Jordan

2.80

2.80

10,300,869


Kenya

3.50

3.50

56,215,221


Kuwait: F, SA, PA

2.10

2.10

4,380,326


Lesotho: R, I, F

3.10

3.10

2,175,699


Liberia: R, I, F

4.30

4.30

5,305,117


Liechtenstein: R, PA, +

1.60

1.60

38,387


Malaysia

2.00

2.00

33,181,072


Mauritius: R, I, F, PA

1.40

1.40

1,274,727


Monaco: R, I, F, 



39,783


Morocco: SA

2.40

2.40

37,772,756


Namibia: R, I, F

3.40

3.40

2,633,874


Nauru: R, I, F, +



10,903


Niger: F

6.90

6.90

26,083,660


Pakistan

3.50

3.50

229,488,994


Peru

2.30

2.30

33,684,208


Poland: R, I, PA

1.50

1.50

37,739,785


Qatar: F

1.90

1.90

2,979,915


R, I, F



0


Rep. of Korea: R, I, SA, +

1.00

1.00

51,329,899


Saint Kitts & Nevis: †

2.10

2.10

53,871


Saint Lucia: R, I

1.40

1.40

185,113


Samoa

3.90

3.90

202,239


Saudi Arabia: SA, PA

2.30

2.30

35,844,909


Seychelles: R, I, F, +

2.40

2.40

99,426


Togo: R, I, F

4.30

4.30

8,680,837


Trinidad & Tobago: †

1.70

1.70

1,406,585


Vanuatu

3.80

3.80

321,832


Zimbabwe: R, I, F,

3.60

3.60

15,331,428

4

Barbados: R, I, F, PA

1.60

1.60

288,023


Belize: F

2.30

2.30

412,190


Ethiopia: R, I, F, +

4.20

4.20

120,812,698


Fiji: R, I, F, PA

2.80

2.80

909,466


Finland: R, F, +

1.40

1.40

5,554,960


Great Britain: F

1.70

1.70

68,497,907


Hong Kong: R, I, F

1.10

1.10

7,604,299


India: R, F, PA

2.20

2.20

1,406,631,776


Japan: R, SA

1.40

1.40

125,584,838


Rwanda: R, I, F, +

4.00

4.00

13,600,464


Saint Vincent & Grenadines: R, I, F

1.90

1.90

39,730


Taiwan: R, I, F, SA, PA



23,888,595


Zambia: F

4.60

4.60

19,470,234

5

Albania: PA

1.60

1.60

2,866,374


Argentina W14

2.30

2.30

46,010,234


Armenia: PA

1.80

1.80

2,971,966


Australia: 

1.70

1.70

26,068,792


Austria D90

1.50

1.50

9,066,710


Azerbaijan

1.70

1.70

10,300,205


Belarus

1.40

1.40

9,432,800


Belgium W14

1.60

1.60

11,668,278


Bosnia-Herzegovina: PA

1.30

1.30

3,249,317


Bulgaria

1.60

1.60

6,844,597


Cambodia W14 : PA

2.50

2.50

17,168,639


Canada°

1.50

1.50

38,388,419


Cape Verde



567,678


China°: SX

1.70

1.70

1,448,471,400


CroatiaW10 : PA

1.50

1.50

4,059,286


Cuba: PA

1.60

1.60

11,305,652


Cyprus

1.30

1.30

1,223,387


Czech Rep.: PA

1.70

1.70

10,736,784


Dem. People’s Rep. of Korea°

1.90

1.90

25,990,679


Denmark: PA

1.70

1.70

5,834,950


Estonia

1.70

1.70

1,321,910


FranceW14

1.90

1.90

65,584,518


French Guiana



314,169


Georgia: PA

2.10

2.10

3,968,738


Germany

1.60

1.60

83,883,596


Greece: PA

1.40

1.40

10,316,637


Guinea-Bissauº

4.50

4.50

2,063,367


GuyanaW8

2.50

2.50

794,045


Hungary

1.60

1.60

9,606,259


Iceland W22

1.70

1.70

345,393


Ireland

1.80

1.80

5,020,199


ItalyD90

1.30

1.30

60,262,770


Kazakhstan

2.80

2.80

19,205,043


Kosovo W10 : PA, SX



0


Kyrgyzstan

3.30

3.30

6,728,271


Latvia: PA

1.60

1.60

1,848,837


Lithuania: PA

1.60

1.60

2,661,708


Luxembourg W14

1.40

1.40

642,371


Macedonia (formerly

1.50

1.50

2,081,304


Macedonia): PA



0


MaldivesD120

1.90

1.90

540,985


Moldova: PA

1.30

1.30

4,013,171


Mongolia D90

2.90

2.90

3,378,078


Montenegro: PA, SX

1.70

1.70

627,950


Mozambique

4.90

4.90

33,089,461


Nepal: SX

1.90

1.90

30,225,582


Netherlands∞

1.60

1.60

17,211,447


New Caledonia



290,915


New ZealandW20

2.00

2.00

4,898,203


Northern Ireland



0


Norway: PA

1.60

1.60

5,511,370


Portugal

1.40

1.40

10,140,570


Puerto Rico∞



2,829,812


Republic of North



0


RomaniaW14

1.80

1.80

19,031,335


Russian Fed.

1.60

1.60

145,805,947


Sao Tome & Principe

4.30

4.30

227,679


Serbia: PA

1.50

1.50

8,653,016


SingaporeW24

1.10

1.10

5,943,546


Slovak Rep.: PA

1.50

1.50

5,460,193


Slovenia: PA

1.60

1.60

2,078,034


South Africa

2.40

2.40

60,756,135


SpainW14 : PA

1.30

1.30

46,719,142


SwedenW18

1.80

1.80

10,218,971


Switzerland

1.50

1.50

8,773,637


Tajikistan

3.60

3.60

9,957,464


Thailand

1.50

1.50

70,078,203


TunisiaD90

2.20

2.20

12,046,656


Turkey W10 : SA, PA

2.10

2.10

85,561,976


Turkmenistan

2.80

2.80

6,201,943


Ukraine

1.30

1.30

43,192,122


United States∞: PA, 

1.70

1.70

334,805,269


Uruguay: PA

2.00

2.00

3,496,016


Uzbekistan

2.40

2.40

34,382,084


Vietna

2.00

2.00

98,953,541

Total Result


2.20

2.68

7,944,436,655



Sunday, 10 April 2022

The Five Stages of Grief, after one of your books is returned on Amazon

 The Five Stages of Grief, after one of your books is returned on Amazon:

Denial – Amazon must have made a mistake, or someone just accidentally hit the return button. It will be fixed soon.

Anger – The cheapskate bought the book, read it quickly and returned it. I hate cheaters like that.

Bargaining – If I could just talk to that reader and explain things, I am sure he or she would re-purchase the book. Maybe if I do a re-write and re-publish, it will never happen again.

Depression – What did I expect, I am a terrible writer and should just give up.

Acceptance – Big deal. My return rate is low, so it doesn’t mean anything. You can’t please everyone. I’ll bet Shakespeare had some unhappy customers, too.



To be honest, returns don’t bother me – I was just looking for something amusing to blog about, and an excuse to do a meme (the drawing is from the internet, the text is mine). :)

Actually my return rate is low, about 0.5%. And it is true, you can’t please everyone. I’m not sure about the Shakespeare thing, though.

Anyway, here is the book that that was returned, and thus motivated this blog. It’’s return rate is about 1.5%. It even did pretty well as a Freebie, back in those halcyon days of Dec 2015.

 

It's Time for a Road Trip – On the Road with Bronco Billy

It's April, and the sun is beginning to come on noticeably stronger in the more temperate regions. Spring is here now, and that brings on thoughts of ROAD TRIP. Sure, it is still a bit early, but you can still start making plans for your next road trip with help of “On the Road with Bronco Billy”. Sit back and go on a ten day trucking trip in a big rig, through western North America, from Alberta to Texas, and back again. Explore the countryside, learn some trucking lingo, and observe the shifting cultural norms across this great continent. Then, come spring, try it out for yourself.

It’s, 99 cents otherwise, but is free every 3 months or so, if you want to watch for it and save a buck.

Amazon U.S.: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00X2IRHSK

Amazon U.K.: http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00X2IRHSK

Amazon Germany: http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B00X2IRHSK

Amazon Canada: http://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B00X2IRHSK


Here’s the summary:

=======================================================

What follows is an account of a ten day journey through western North America during a working trip, delivering lumber from Edmonton Alberta to Dallas Texas, and returning with oilfield equipment. The writer had the opportunity to accompany a friend who is a professional truck driver, which he eagerly accepted. He works as a statistician for the University of Alberta, and is therefore is generally confined to desk, chair, and computer. The chance to see the world from the cab of a truck, and be immersed in the truck driving culture was intriguing. In early May 1997 they hit the road.

Some time has passed since this journal was written and many things have changed since the late 1990’s. That renders the journey as not just a geographical one, but also a historical account, which I think only increases its interest.

We were fortunate to have an eventful trip - a mechanical breakdown, a near miss from a tornado, and a large-scale flood were among these events. But even without these turns of fate, the drama of the landscape, the close-up view of the trucking lifestyle, and the opportunity to observe the cultural habits of a wide swath of western North America would have been sufficient to fill up an interesting journal.

The travelogue is about 20,000 words, about 60 to 90 minutes of reading, at typical reading speeds.

=======================================================

Saturday, 2 April 2022

How About a Week in San Francisco (April 1-4, 2022) Free on Amazon.

 

 

U.S.: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09675F6MJ

U.K.: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B09675F6MJ

Germany: https://www.amazon.de/dp/B09675F6MJ

Japan: https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B09675F6MJ

Canada: https://www.amazon.ca/dp/B09675F6MJ

Australia: https://www.amazon.com.au/dp/B09675F6MJ

India: https://www.amazon.in/dp/B09675F6MJ

As the Covid-19 lockdown is eased, it is natural to want to travel and explore. San Francisco is a world-famous city, one that everyone should try to see at least once in their lifetime.

San Francisco, in central California, is one of the top tourist destinations in the United States. In addition, it generally rates very highly on lists of top “world-class” cities.

What makes San Francisco so compelling? I would say that it is a combination of a beautiful natural setting, a fascinating history and a remarkable blend of cultures, along with a tolerant and welcoming attitude towards newcomers and new things. Plus, there are a great many sights to see, combining a touristy nature and a local “we live here” authenticity.

The book describes a trip of to the city of about a week, which is time enough to see a lot, but not enough time to see even a small fraction of what the city and environs has to explore. In our case, we did a lot of foot-based sightseeing and bus touring in the city and around the bay, as well as taking a nice bus-based wine tour of some of the Sonoma/Napa valley wineries. It was definitely a week well spent. The book is about 20,000 words, about two hours at typical reading speeds.